“The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.” – G. K. Chesterton
The playground taunt, “It’s a free country; I can say what I like!” became a particularly expedient mantra on college campuses following the wake of the October 7 attack on Israel. Campus riots and encampments, canceled graduations, and infamous Congressional hearings with presidents of elite universities set the question of free speech on college campuses at the forefront of academic debate.
The framework of “inquiry” and “expression” that pervades the mission statements of universities across America has reached the halls of Notre Dame, bringing with it a discussion on free speech and Catholic education.
A recent “Statement on Freedom of Expression” signed by Notre Dame president Father Robert Dowd, C.S.C. outlined the ways in which the university seeks to promote this “freedom” within the institution. The statement—drawing heavily from last year’s document on the same topic—begins by recognizing the division and conflict present in the nation and at the university.
In support of “academic freedom” and viewpoint diversity, it then states: “Some of the views expressed may not be in accord with the principles of Catholic teaching or the values of the University, even as we ensure that Catholic views are represented on campus.”
Certainly, a Catholic university should represent Catholic views—and Notre Dame undoubtedly does. But is that all she is required to do?
Mere representation of Catholic views cannot be the box to check. If representation is the standard, Harvard, Yale, and Stanford could all be considered “Catholic.” Even Northern Illinois University has a “Catholic center” on campus.
To understand the mission of Catholic education—to dedicate an institution to it—is to commit to the search for truth. Though “freedom of expression” can be a facilitator of this search, it does not serve as an end in itself; and moreover, appropriate limits must guide this freedom.
Notably, however, the statement does enumerate limits of free speech: “The right of free expression does not, of course, extend to speech that threatens violence or constitutes harassment against an individual or a group. Such expressions violate University values and policies and will not be tolerated.”
The university understands that threats of physical violence and harm are contrary to its core principles and merit censorship. But why draw the line here? Should a university committed to the threefold “formation of mind, body, and spirit” emphasize the physical safety of its students without acknowledging the importance of their spiritual well-being?
To ignore the spiritual dangers of drag shows, pro-abortion talks, and “PrideFests” is to ignore an essential component of the Catholic university’s responsibility. A true education—aimed at mind, body, and spirit—pursues truth and rejects falsehood in all three areas. Promoting freedom of expression at the expense of spiritual health does a disservice to every student who came to this university—Our Lady’s University—seeking a holistic education.
Notre Dame’s recent message reflects the principles of an entirely different university, citing the University of Chicago’s statement on freedom of expression. It adds that Catholicism “calls us to do more” than merely tolerate the expression of opposing viewpoints, urging the community to “engage those who hold such views … with respect and charity.”
While the statement is correct to alter UChicago’s secular framework, it misconstrues “charity” as politeness. Catholicism cannot be diluted to a religion of “niceness.” Respect for others, rooted in a recognition of human dignity, must not dismiss objective truth. The distinction between the person and the person’s opinion is easily lost when the distinction between respect and acceptance is not made.
Contrary to modern thought, education is not a ‘creed of respect’ or a ‘marketplace of ideas,’ but a formation in established principles. The perennial roots of classical education can inform our discussion. The very word “education,” derived from the Latin educere, means “to lead out.” Plato’s Analogy of the Cave, the classical image of liberal education, comes to mind when considering this exodus. A true education leads out of darkness and into light; it guides the student away from the false imitation of the shadows; and ultimately, it provides a true freedom that directs one to God.
The sole traveler from the cave does not agreeably allow his companions to remain chained up, absorbed in the hollow representations of reality before them. He does not say, “These views are contrary to my beliefs, but I will respect their opinions.” He instead attempts to free the others, to guide them upwards towards the light.
The responsibility every Catholic has as a member of the Church is immense. Truth brings responsibility—a personal responsibility to live according to the truth, and an evangelical responsibility to share that truth. This journey is not isolated, nor is it isolating. The unique position of Notre Dame as a Catholic university lends itself to a community rooted not in boundless expression, but rather in authentic human charity.
Bridgette Rodgers is a junior studying political science and theology. You can reach her at brodger4@nd.edu.
